Nber Working Paper Series Health Reform, Health Insurance, and Selection: Estimating Selection into Health Insurance Using the Massachusetts Health Reform
نویسندگان
چکیده
We implement an empirical test for selection into health insurance using changes in coverage induced by the introduction of mandated health insurance in Massachusetts. Our test examines changes in the cost of the newly insured relative to those who were insured prior to the reform. We find that counties with larger increases in insurance coverage over the reform period face the smallest increase in average hospital costs for the insured population, consistent with adverse selection into insurance before the reform. Additional results, incorporating cross-state variation and data on health measures, provide further evidence for adverse selection. Martin B. Hackmann Department of Economics Yale University 37 Hillhouse Avenue Box 208264 New Haven, CT 06520 [email protected] Jonathan T. Kolstad The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania 306 Colonial Penn Center 3641 Locust Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104 and NBER [email protected] Amanda E. Kowalski Department of Economics Yale University 37 Hillhouse Avenue Box 208264 New Haven, CT 06520 and NBER [email protected] Health Reform, Health Insurance, and Selection: Estimating Selection into Health Insurance Using the Massachusetts
منابع مشابه
HEALTH REFORM, HEALTH INSURANCE, AND SELECTION: ESTIMATING SELECTION INTO HEALTH INSURANCE USING THE MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH REFORM By
We implement an empirical test for selection into health insurance using changes in coverage induced by the introduction of mandated health insurance in Massachusetts. Our test examines changes in the cost of the newly insured relative to those who were insured prior to the reform. We find that counties with larger increases in insurance coverage over the reform period face the smallest increas...
متن کاملHealth Reform, Health Insurance, and Selection: Estimating Selection into Health Insurance Using the Massachusetts Health Reform.
Approximately 49.9 million people in the United States lack health insurance (DeNavas-Walt, Proctor and Smith (2011)). One potential driver of uninsurance is asymmetric information on health risk between insurers and the insured. Asymmetric information can distort available insurance contracts, as in Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976), or it can raise premiums for the relatively healthy, as in Aker...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Adverse Selection and an Individual Mandate: When Theory Meets Practice
We develop a model of selection that incorporates a key element of recent health reforms: an individual mandate. We identify a set of key parameters for welfare analysis, allowing us to model the welfare impact of the actual policy as well as to estimate the socially optimal penalty level. Using data from Massachusetts, we estimate the key parameters of the model. We compare health insurance co...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Welfare Reform, Labor Supply, and Health Insurance in the Immigrant Population
Although the 1996 welfare reform legislation limited the eligibility of immigrant households to receive assistance, many states chose to protect their immigrant populations by offering state-funded aid to these groups. I exploit these changes in eligibility rules to examine the link between the welfare cutbacks and health insurance coverage in the immigrant population. The data reveal that the ...
متن کاملMassachusetts health care reform: is it working?
Before 2006, Massachusetts had more than 500 000 residents who lacked health insurance. Governor Mitt Romney enacted landmark legislation requiring all residents to obtain health insurance. Also, the legislation established a health insurance exchange for the purpose of broadening the choices of insurance plans made available to individuals in the state. The purpose of this research was to asse...
متن کامل